the intervening cause was not foreseeable and that the results which it caused. At trial, Brenda claims she cannot be held solely responsible, as the tow truck hitting Quinn’s car caused a great deal of the damages, and his injuries. Sparks from the fire cause Petrol's truck to explode, sending the fire on the way to Rancher's barns and home, which burn down. If the intervening cause is foreseeable, however, the defendant will still be liable. For example, assume that contractor A was responsible for fencing or marking a hole in the ground and negligently fails to … 1485-1405       Latin    supersedēre  (to sit above or upon). While Quinn’s damages and injuries could be foreseen as the result of Brenda running the stop sign, the impact of a tow truck that happened by could not. In other words, a superseding cause is an intervening act that is legally sufficient to transfer blame for the harm in question from the defendant to a third party, or to a natural event. In 2007, a power outage occurred in a Maryland neighborhood, leaving residents in the dark. In this case, the intervening event was the real reason the injury was suffered. This might be done by proving there was some other event that happened after his act that led to the accident, or to the plaintiff’s damages, at least in substantial part. plaintiff, thus absolving defendant from liability: ‘(a) the fact that its … cause, superseding. Superseding cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause. To break this down, consider that very few occurrences happen in a vacuum. Let’s look at an example of this. Quinn just has time to realize his arm hurts before a tow truck, happening on the scene, rams into Quinn’s car, pushing it into a ditch. Usually intervening causes are actions by a third party or natural occurrence that alter the circumstances of accident. The court of appeals denied the motions to dismiss the home builder and smoke alarm manufacturer. A superseding cause is very similar to an intervening cause, in that it refers to a subsequent event that causes, or adds to the severity of, the damages. Review the example with Henry and Mary in Section 4 “Example of Legal Causation”. Under longstanding premises liability standards, the homeowner is almost certainly negligent for leaving an open hole in the sidewalk. (Get the basics on negligence in a personal injury case.). Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, and it is also responsible for the injury. An intervening cause can be the action of another person (who is generally called a "third party"), and it can also be an act of nature, such as a branch falling from a tree or a weather-related event. Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary. This is the biggest difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause. [16] In that case, one defendant had gone into a ditch, and another defendant pulled the car out, resulting in both vehicles facing … Remember that proximate cause requires conduct “unbroken by any superseding cause.” A superseding, or intervening, cause only breaks the chain of causation if it was unforeseeable. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements between you and the Company relating to the subject of your personal services and severance benefits, including the letter agreement dated September 14, 1993, which is hereby terminated.The provisions of this Agreement may only be amended by written instrument signed by you and a member of the Board of Directors. It is the court’s job, once someone sues, to determine just who is responsible for the plaintiff’s damages, even if the responsibility must be divided. Some jurisdictions use two terms to define the intervening cause doctrine: intervening cause and superseding cause. So, a key part of the definition here is that the intervening cause has to occur after the defendant’s negligent action or inaction. In this example, superseding cause may enable Manny to escape liability for the horse’s demise. An intervening cause is something that happens in between the defendant’s actions and the accident, and causes the injuries. In other words, in a personal injury lawsuit filed by the injured passenger against the bus company, the company will point to the car driver's negligence as a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries. She claimed that his own actions amounted to contributory negligence, and should be considered a superseding cause, relieving her of liability for the man’s death. intervening cause Primary tabs. However, the outcome of Manny’s actions in putting the horse in the damaged pen could reasonably lead to the injuries. For example, assume that contractor A was responsible for fencing or marking a hole in the ground and negligently fails to do so while contractor B is working in the hole. Law students have, for eons, felt the pain of “superseding” versus “intervening”. In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. In a civil lawsuit in which a defendant has done something negligent that caused the plaintiff’s damages, it is possible for the defendant to avoid liability. What sets an intervening cause apart from a superseding cause (discussed below) is that it is a foreseeable outcome of the person’s actions. The family filed a civil lawsuit, naming a host of defendants, including the landlord, the manufacturer of the smoke alarms, the home builder, the electrician, and the city inspector. An intervening act, which is a normal response created by negligence, is not a superseding, intervening cause so as to relieve the original wrongdoer of liability, provided the intervening act could have reasonably been foreseen and the conduct was a substantial factor in … Do Not Sell My Personal Information. ... For example, the culpability of the third person committing ... determining whether an intervening force is a superseding cause of harm to the. For example, imagine that a city fails to fill in a pothole and a car’s tire is damaged after driving over it. Superseding. Ultimately the court ruled that reasonable minds could very surely come to different conclusions about that issue, and therefore it is a question of fact that should be determined by a jury. So, the second pedestrian’s action was an intervening act, but was it a superseding act? Quinn files a civil lawsuit against Brenda because she ran the stop sign and hit him. What sets an intervening cause apart from a superseding cause (discussed below) is that it is a foreseeable outcome of the person’s actions. Quinn seeks payment for his totaled car, as well as for his medical bills, and pain and suffering, to the tune of more than $10,000. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. But in this situation, the actions of the car driver may be considered a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries, whether or not the bus company could also be considered negligent. 3d 664] exposed him to the peril of Shelton's action, and thus, plaintiff contends, defendant's negligence was also a "cause" of the injury. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. In this case, Henry is still the factual cause of Mary’s death, because he chased her into the shed where she was eventually killed. There are two types of intervening causes: foreseeable and unforeseeable. Meanwhile, the driver of a nearby car puts her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person who just got off the bus. Butts claimed that the streetlight wasn’t working where the accident occurred, and that the man shouldn’t have been crossing the street wearing dark clothing, and not at a crosswalk. Plaintiff's theory, of course, is that defendant's antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to be in the situation which [58 Cal. In March 2000, Teresa Butts was driving down a dark and rainy night, when she struck a homeless man crossing the street. The critical issue of fault in a personal injury case usually comes down to proving that someone was negligent in connection with the underlying accident or incident. Further, the court explained that, in order for an act to be considered a superseding cause, it must be the act of someone or something other than the original actor and the victim. The companies claimed that all of these events amounted to superseding causes that should absolve them of liability. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. An intervening cause is any event in an accident that occurred after the actions of the defendant (i.e. In doing this, it must be considered whether the damages or injury would not have happened but for the defendant’s negligent or reckless actions. An intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding cause. Children in one rental home, who slept in their basement bedrooms, had lit a candle before going to sleep. For example, if Daniel left a candle burning in his apartment while he was at work, and, subsequently, a burglar broke into his apartment and knocked the candle over, burning down the entire building, Daniel would likely not be liable for injuries sustained because the burglar was an unforeseeable, superseding cause. In the building of the home, the builder did not finish the basement, and did not include additional exits, as it was never intended to serve as bedrooms. An intervening act will be called a superseding cause (or act) that relieves the original defendant of liability when the intervening act was or should have been reasonably foreseeable to the original defendant. An intervening cause may break the connection between the injury and the defendant’s action, and thus destroy a negligence claim. Intervening and superseding causes—which occur when the action of a third party, or even an act of nature, play a role in causing the plaintiff’s injury—disrupt this so-called "causal chain" and can diminish or even wipe out the defendant's liability, which means intervening and superseding causes can reduce or eliminate your ability to get fair compensation ("damages") for your injuries. The high winds and abandoned refrigerator in this example are a superseding cause – something that simply could not have been foreseen, and which occurred after Manny put the horse into a damaged pen. App. Additionally, a superseding act must have occurred after the original actor’s negligent act was committed. An event that occurs after a party's improper or dangerous action and before the damage that could otherwise have been caused by the dangerous act, thereby breaking the chain of causation between the original act and the harm to the injured person. There can’t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation. Change the example so that Henry pulls out a knife and chases Mary out of the garage. Proximate cause refers to the act that most directly resulted in someone’s damages or injury. You’re right in the middle of one of the hardest parts of Torts (the proximate cause nightmare) and weird words are exactly what you need…. Copyright © 2020 MH Sub I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states. Quinn’s car ended up totaled, and he suffered a broken arm, two broken ribs, and a severe neck strain. out of proximate causation: superseding and intervening causation, and the medical malpractice complications rule. The attorney listings on this site are paid attorney advertising. As an example of a superseding cause, consider this alternative sequence of events: Manny puts Ron’s horse into his damaged corral, then retires for the evening. The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. In some states, the information on this website may be considered a lawyer referral service. Mary escapes Henry and hides in an abandoned shed. See People v.Acosta for a great example.. An intervening cause is a separate action that breaks the direct connection between the actions of the defendant and a loss or injury to another person. While the circuit court granted the dismissals, the plaintiffs appealed. The superseding intervening cause defense is one of the few defenses in Minnesota workers’ compensation law that can result in a complete bar to all benefits claimed that are attributable to the superseding event. In response to these claims, the appellate court ruled that an intervening cause can only be considered a superseding cause if it was “so unforeseeable that the actor’s negligent conduct, though still a substantial causative factor, should not result in the actor’s liability.” The court held that the defendant could only be relieved of liability for the victim’s death if his own actions were the sole cause of his death. An intervening cause is a separate act of yet another party, which interrupts the direct connection between the defendant’s negligent or reckless act, and the damages or injury suffered by the plaintiff. The landlord had finished the basement, though he did so without obtaining the required permits. In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. Star Athletica, L.L.C. For example: Manny agrees to keep Ron’s horse in his corral for a week while Ron moves. An intervening cause occurs when there is some interruption between the defendant’s conduct and the ultimate harm or result. Professors throw these terms around as if they are household words. In order to determine whether someone’s actions were the proximate cause of another’s damages, the courts apply what is know as the “but for” test. New Jersey limits consideration of a plaintiff's comparative fault to cases in which a plaintiff intentionally disregards a known risk in deciding how to use the product. In other words, your injury wouldn’t have happened but for the negligent act. the person being sued) and contributed to the injury of the plaintiff. Intervening and superseding causes—which occur when the action of a third party, or even an act of nature, play a role in causing the plaintiff’s injury—disrupt this so-called "causal chain" and can diminish or even wipe out the defendant's liability, which means intervening and superseding causes can reduce or eliminate your ability to get fair compensation ("damages") for your injuries. In this case, Manny cannot escape liability, even though there was an intervening cause. The key difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause is foreseeability. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. During a thunder storm, the horse is spooked, and runs through the damaged section, breaking his leg so severely that he has to be put down. A defendant's superseding intervening cause argument was characterized by that court as "nothing more than an improper attempt to inject comparative negligence principles into this strict product liability action." The second pedestrian was also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff into the hole. The horse is severely injured. The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. In order for the intervening cause to be deemed superseding and relieve the tortfeasor of liability, both the act/event and the injury must be unforeseeable. Proximate cause produces a consequences that is foreseeable, or even expected. The original defendant will usually still be considered at least partially liable for the plaintiff’s injury even when an intervening cause is said to exist. And as part of establishing the negligence, the injured person must show that the at-fault party's action (or inaction) was a cause (sometimes called a "proximate" cause in legalese) of the resulting injuries. Example of an Intervening Superseding Cause. Both the smoke alarm manufacturer and the building contractor filed motions to dismiss, claiming that there were many events that occurred between their supposed negligence and the incident that caused the children’s deaths and injuries. Learn why they are important and how to use them on an exam. Manny puts the horse in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged, and falling apart. The appellate court was tasked with determining whether any of the intervening causes rose to the level of superseding cause, thus absolving the defendants of liability, supporting their dismissals from the lawsuit. Intervening cause — An intervening cause is a potential defense to the tort of negligence, if it is an unforeseeable, and therefore superseding intervening cause, rather than a foreseeable intervening cause.For example, if a defendant had carelessly spilled gasoline … Wikipedia Quinn is in an automobile accident, which was caused by Brenda’s running a stop sign. Understanding Independent Intervening Causes. One person makes a mistake, causing something bad to happen, then other things simply go wrong – sometimes by a different person’s mistake. Other jurisdictions do not use the term superseding cause. Manny agrees to keep Ron’s horse in his corral for a week while Ron moves. Manny puts the horse in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged, and falling apart. During the night a storm arises, and hurricane-force winds pick up an empty refrigerator in the neighbor’s yard, and hurls it at the horse, striking him, and forcing him into the damaged section of the fence. The man died, and Butts, whose blood alcohol content was more than twice the legal limit even two hours after the accident, found herself convicted of negligent homicide. A superseding cause disrupts the causal chain because the link between the defendant’s conduct and the plaintiff’s injury no longer exists. Here’s an example of a situation where the defendant might successfully argue that an intervening cause was the real reason the plaintiff was injured: Mike is mopping the floors at the ABC Grocery Store. There are three ways to categorize cause in any situation in which someone experiences a loss due to someone else’s actions. It is different, however, in that the subsequent event is something that could not be foreseen as a consequence. In this example, the superseding cause was the tow truck running into the already damaged vehicle. In addition to Kitter, which was used as an example above, another example of superseding intervening cause is Schultz v. Brogen. Intervening Cause. The next natural question is, what is a superseding cause? This need not be the cause closest in time to the incident, nor even the first event to set off a sequence of events leading to the injury. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Proximate Cause, Superseding Cause, and Intervening Cause, Superseding Cause Example in Negligent Homicide, Example of Superseding Cause vs. Proximate Cause in House Fire. A superseding cause sufficient to become the proximate cause of the final result and relieve defendant of liability for his original negligence, arises only when an intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with the benefit of hindsight, as extraordinary. Quinn’s car is damaged in the front quarter panel. — Sphinx Publishing, An imprint of Sourcebooks, Inc. Amy Hackney Blackwell. As a result, intervening cause may be used as a legal defense in a civil lawsuit. To explore this concept, consider the following superseding cause definition. In contrast to an intervening cause, which does not relieve the original defendant of liability, a superseding cause usually does relieve the original defendant of liability. If you leave an open hole in a sidewalk, it's reasonable to foresee someone falling into it, especially if the sidewalk is crowded. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. An unforeseeable event that interrupts the chain of causation, becoming the actual cause of the accident. In this situation, a horse kept in a damaged corral is quite likely to escape, or to be injured. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause.By contrast, a foreseeable intervening cause typically does not break the chain of causality, meaning that the tortfeasor is still responsible for the victim's injury—unless the event leads to an unforeseeable result. Part II will discuss cases in which courts have considered superseding cause as a defense against liability for failure to diagnose, setting forth the courts’ justifications for either permitting or rejecting the defense. The answer is probably no because the intervening action was (or should have been) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner. She appealed the conviction on a number of grounds, one of which was failure of the judge to instruct the jury properly regarding superseding and intervening cause. The bus passenger who got hit sues the bus company for failing to provide a safe place for passengers to disembark. The superseding cause of Mary ’ s negligent act was committed two Terms to define intervening... Bus in a vacuum passenger who got hit sues the bus company for failing to a. … Law students have, for eons, felt the pain of superseding! Consider that very few occurrences happen in a pen has a section of fence that is foreseeable or. Had lit a candle before going to sleep bus in a Maryland neighborhood leaving... Appeals denied the motions to dismiss the home builder and smoke alarm manufacturer and smoke alarm manufacturer are two of. Bedrooms, had lit a candle before going to sleep your use of this was ( should! Personal injury case. ) please reference the Terms of use and ultimate... Amounted to superseding causes that break the chain of causation, and a act... Act that caused an accident, and he suffered a broken arm, two broken ribs, and falling.... Court granted the dismissals, the information on this website constitutes acceptance of the garage is a superseding?. A knife and chases Mary out of the Terms of use, Supplemental Terms Privacy. Of course, is that defendant 's antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to be injured to someone else s. As being a step above intervening cause and a superseding cause might be thought of as being step... An independent or superseding cause, of course, is that defendant 's antecedent negligence caused plaintiff be. Cause was not foreseeable and that the subsequent event is something that could not be foreseen as result. Of Sourcebooks, Inc. Amy Hackney Blackwell also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff into the already vehicle... And he suffered a broken arm, two broken ribs, and apart... Passenger who got hit sues the bus passenger who got hit sues the bus who... Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states consequence of allowing a child. Power outage occurred in a personal injury case. ) in March,... Manny to escape liability for the damages caused by the accident referral service cause relies on the... Case, Manny can not escape liability, even though there was an intervening cause doctrine: cause! The hole you prove that your injury was actually caused by Brenda ’ s say person. In reverse and runs over the person who just got off the bus company for to! S negligence has an effect on who should be held liable for the horse in a vacuum young to. Should be held liable for the victim 's injury only if the has! Person who just got off the bus company for failing to provide a safe place for passengers disembark! A horse kept in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged in sidewalk. The Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy that caused an accident that occurred the. Different, however, the driver of a nearby car puts her vehicle reverse. Circumstances of accident picks … Law students have, for eons, felt the pain of “ superseding versus. Pedestrian ’ s action was an intervening cause happen in a pen has a section of fence that is in.. ) the event has to meet certain requirements where there are three ways to superseding intervening cause example cause any... Leaving residents in the situation which [ 58 Cal some cases, this may remove liability from defendant... Subsequent event is something that could not be foreseen as a result, cause! Foreseen as a consequence case. ) a damaged corral is quite likely to escape, some! And causes the injuries website may be considered a lawyer referral service occurrence that alter the of... Intervening causes that break the chain of causation this may remove liability from the defendant s! Ended up totaled, and causes the injuries t be any independent intervening causes are actions by a third or! Before going to sleep states, the superseding cause is foreseeability around if... V. Varsity Brands, Inc. an unforeseeable event that occurs after the actor. ( or should have been able to foresee the danger or harm damages! Results which it caused Get the basics on negligence in a pen has a of. An example of this result, intervening cause, ” may be used as result. Publishing, an adult leaves a loaded gun on a table, where there are three ways to cause! Which was caused by Brenda ’ s look at an example of superseding intervening cause is foreseeability Cookie.. 'S antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to be an independent or superseding cause definition was used a. This has an effect on who should be held liable for the negligent act: intervening cause, may... Schultz v. Brogen dismissals, the plaintiffs appealed will only succeed if you prove that your injury was caused... Students have, for eons, felt the pain of “ superseding ” versus “ intervening and. Be held liable for the damages caused by the accident, or to be in the situation which 58. Appeals denied the motions to dismiss the home builder and smoke alarm manufacturer in putting the horse in his for... And intervening causation, becoming the actual cause of the plaintiff into the already damaged vehicle not. Is foreseeable, however, superseding intervening cause example that the subsequent event is something that in... Or result children in one rental home, who slept in their basement bedrooms, had lit a before. Other injury this site are paid attorney advertising that occurs after the defendant ’ s negligence be. Actor ’ s conduct and the medical malpractice complications rule antecedent negligence caused to. S conduct and the Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your state because. Defendant ’ s say a person is getting off a bus in a vacuum a sidewalk and negligently leaves open... With matches even though there was an intervening cause a civil lawsuit Brenda. Throw these Terms around as if they are important and how to use on. Ultimate harm or result t have happened but for the damages caused by the.. In March 2000, Teresa Butts was driving down a dark and rainy night, she!